b:botstest.Submit a resource ↗

Benchmarks / Research

faultline · amanshah0729

Faultline studies LIBERO policy robustness using perturbation and ablation workflows.

benchmarkingevaluationlerobotliberorobot-learning
Publisher repository ↗
faultline · amanshah0729 resource page screenshot
Resource screenshot · captured 2026-10-08 · visually reviewed

Overview

Faultline studies LIBERO policy robustness using perturbation and ablation workflows.

Publisher summary: “Measuring what a LIBERO success rate hides. Perturbation + ablation harness, 4 policies, ~2,000 rollouts, one laptop, no CUDA.”

Use its repository to inspect the implementation, documentation and supported workflows. This directory record identifies the maintainer, code license and related resources; it does not claim that the project has been installed or tested on your robot.

Project information

Maintainer
amanshah0729
Primary language
Python
Repository code license
Not specified
Model-weight license
Not recorded
Dataset license
Not recorded
Hardware design license
Not recorded
Maintenance
Not archived in the last recorded metadata
Last observed repository push
2026-08-14

Code licenses do not automatically cover model weights, datasets or hardware designs. Unrecorded license details require confirmation with the publisher.

Documentation sections

  • Faultline
  • Why this matters
  • Result 1 — the benchmark cannot distinguish policies that are not close
  • Result 2 — these policies ignore inputs they are assumed to use
  • Result 3 — the most damaging perturbation is the worst one for comparing policies
  • What is and isn't new here

Browse this resource’s categories

Explore related collections

Browse Benchmarks →